For
this reflection, I will touch on the two article readings. The first article, “Reading
Supports for All”, talks about how scaffolding reading is most beneficial for all
students and teachers dealing with the challenges and diverse languages being
brought into the classroom. Specifically, this scaffolding reading experience
(SRE) is most beneficial for the English Language Learners. Throughout the
article, it gives examples on the different stages of this experience and how
to accommodate SREs into the everyday classroom. I think SREs can be beneficial
for the classes that require reading. I see the benefits of the SREs in a
history, English, or science class, but as for math, I am unsure since we do
not typically read from a text. It is example based. I also, however, feel that
the SREs are accredited with support by listing how teachers can realistically
support SREs in their own classroom. I believe that this article went the extra
step to show SREs are broken into three simple stages, pre-reading, during reading,
and post-reading that really can be manageable with students’ and ELL students’
goals in class.
In
“The Early Catastrophe,” I learned that the development of children’s
vocabularies and word exposure experiences are broadened or dwindle by their
socio-economic status (SES). A child’s vocabulary bank increases the higher their
parents’ socio-economic status is in the world. In the reading, I feel as if
the chart really made the driving point for this particular article. After all
the man hours were put in with the 42 families, the hard work and evidence was shown
how a child’s vocabulary directly reflects the parents’ vocabulary and how
quickly or slowly these young children are learning and being exposed to new
words. I think a different point made in the article that went with the
overarching theme and title was that how in the bigger picture, students are
having larger vocabularies with every higher level of SES. There is not just a
couple words difference; it is in the millions! This is incredible, but in the
long run, this makes sense. We are the product of our parents, and I think this
is obvious that their vocabulary builds the foundation for the child’s
vocabulary.
I understand how it might be difficult to incorporate reading into a math class (especially without making it feel superficial), but I think there probably is a good way to do so. You could have them read texts on the history of math concepts they're learning so they know the motivation for the creation of math at the level they're learning! For example, when learning trig you could do a lesson on how Eratosthenes first calculated the size of the Earth using triangles!
ReplyDelete